MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Prediction of Chak Lam Coleman Wong [175th] vs Jorge Martinez Martinez [814th] Head-to-Head At The

By Wojtek Kolan

Head-2-Head: Wong 1 - 0 Martinez

They have played 2 sets in total, with Wong winning 2 and Martinez winning 0. The last match between Wong and Martinez was at the M15 Madrid, 28-10-2021, Second, Clay with Chak Lam Coleman Wong getting the victory 6-4 6-4.

Players Head-To-Head Match Wins
Chak Lam Coleman Wong 1
Jorge Martinez Martinez 0
Wong vs Martinez H2H Profile
Wong Stats Martinez
44% (7-9) YTD Win/Loss 0% (0-0)
1 Head-to-Head 0
175 Ranking 814
128 Highest Rank 552
20 Age 29
- Plays -
2 Titles 0
56% (139-109) Career Total W/L 59% (140-96)
$225,210 Career Prize Money $0
0 YTD Titles 0
0 Hard H2H 0
1 Clay H2H 0
0 Indoor H2H 0
0 Grass H2H 0

Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)

Wong VS Martinez H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-4 6-4
cross
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Jorge Martinez Martinez
68% ( 36 of 53)
1st Serve %
56% ( 37 of 66)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
69% ( 25 of 36)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 24 of 37)
59% ( 10 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 12 of 29)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
100% ( 2 of 2)
34% ( 18 of 53)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 30 of 66)
65
Total Points Won
54

Wong VS Martinez H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Wong Vs Martinez H2H Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong Wong Stats Jorge Martinez Martinez Martinez
1 H2H Matches 0
2 Sets Won 0
12 Games Won 8
5 Aces (Total) 4
1 Total Double Faults 1
1:28:0 Average Match Time 1:28:0
68% (36/53) 1st Serve % 56% (37/66)
69% (25/36) 1st Serve Win % 65% (24/37)
59% (10/17) 2nd Serve Win % 41% (12/29)
40% (4/10) Break Points Won % (Total) 100% (2/2)
45% (30/66) Return Points Win % 34% (18/53)
100% (1/1) Best of 3 Sets Win % 0% (0/1)
0% (0/0) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) Deciding Set Win % 0% (0/0)
100% (1/1) 1st Set Won, Won Match 0% (0/0)
0% (1/0) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 0% (1/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Jorge Martinez Martinez Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Wong 1 - 0 Martinez

Editorial Prediction:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wong has won 48% of points on their second serve, while Martinez has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wong, in recent form, has won 42.93% of their opponent's second serve points, while Martinez has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.18% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Wong has saved 55.05% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Martinez has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Wong has won 51.35% of matches played (W/L 38/ 36), with Martinez winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 115/ 80), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4). Martinez has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 124/ 85), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 16/ 11).
  • Player level: In the last year, Wong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.7% of matches (W/L 29/ 25), where as Martinez has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Wong winning 1 times and Martinez being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Wong winning 2 and Martinez winning 0. The last match between Wong and Martinez was at the M15 Madrid, 28-10-2021, Second, Clay with Chak Lam Coleman Wong getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:28:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Wong and Martinez have played a deciding set 0 times, with Wong winning 0 times and Martinez 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Wong winning 0, and Martinez 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wong has played against opponents with an average rank of 244.78 while Martinez has played against players with an average rank of 0.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wong has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Martinez has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Wong has converted 23.24% of breakpoint opportunities, and Martinez has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
  • Chak Lam Coleman Wong Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    R3
    cross
    Adam Walton
    Player
    Chak Lam Coleman Wong
    67% ( 70 of 104)
    1st Serve %
    65% ( 64 of 99)
    10
    Aces
    15
    0
    Double Faults
    0
    71% ( 50 of 70)
    1st Serve Won
    70% ( 45 of 64)
    53% ( 18 of 34)
    2nd Serve Won
    60% ( 21 of 35)
    75% ( 3 of 4)
    Break Points Won
    43% ( 3 of 7)
    35% ( 36 of 104)
    Rtn Points Won
    33% ( 33 of 99)
    101
    Total Points Won
    102
    L
    7-6(6) 4-6 6-4 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Chak Lam Coleman Wong
    Player
    Ben Shelton
    66% ( 71 of 108)
    1st Serve %
    68% ( 67 of 99)
    8
    Aces
    17
    0
    Double Faults
    2
    72% ( 51 of 71)
    1st Serve Won
    79% ( 53 of 67)
    51% ( 19 of 37)
    2nd Serve Won
    56% ( 18 of 32)
    33% ( 1 of 3)
    Break Points Won
    38% ( 3 of 8)
    35% ( 38 of 108)
    Rtn Points Won
    28% ( 28 of 99)
    98
    Total Points Won
    109
    W
    7-6(3) 2-6 7-6(5) H2H
    R1
    cross
    Chak Lam Coleman Wong
    Player
    Daniel Altmaier
    67% ( 35 of 52)
    1st Serve %
    75% ( 36 of 48)
    5
    Aces
    6
    1
    Double Faults
    0
    91% ( 32 of 35)
    1st Serve Won
    75% ( 27 of 36)
    59% ( 10 of 17)
    2nd Serve Won
    42% ( 5 of 12)
    67% ( 2 of 3)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 4)
    19% ( 10 of 52)
    Rtn Points Won
    33% ( 16 of 48)
    58
    Total Points Won
    42
    W
    6-4 6-3 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Aleksandar Kovacevic
    Player
    Chak Lam Coleman Wong
    60% ( 34 of 57)
    1st Serve %
    53% ( 35 of 66)
    4
    Aces
    6
    1
    Double Faults
    1
    82% ( 28 of 34)
    1st Serve Won
    66% ( 23 of 35)
    78% ( 18 of 23)
    2nd Serve Won
    65% ( 20 of 31)
    29% ( 2 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    19% ( 11 of 57)
    Rtn Points Won
    35% ( 23 of 66)
    69
    Total Points Won
    54
    L
    6-2 7-6(6) H2H
    R1
    cross
    Chak Lam Coleman Wong
    Player
    Billy Harris
    57% ( 56 of 98)
    1st Serve %
    61% ( 59 of 96)
    12
    Aces
    6
    2
    Double Faults
    3
    73% ( 41 of 56)
    1st Serve Won
    73% ( 43 of 59)
    64% ( 27 of 42)
    2nd Serve Won
    51% ( 19 of 37)
    57% ( 4 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 2 of 8)
    31% ( 30 of 98)
    Rtn Points Won
    35% ( 34 of 96)
    102
    Total Points Won
    92
    W
    6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Pavel Kotov
    Player
    Chak Lam Coleman Wong
    67% ( 67 of 100)
    1st Serve %
    60% ( 58 of 96)
    1
    Aces
    2
    2
    Double Faults
    4
    72% ( 48 of 67)
    1st Serve Won
    62% ( 36 of 58)
    52% ( 17 of 33)
    2nd Serve Won
    61% ( 23 of 38)
    80% ( 4 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 3 of 6)
    35% ( 35 of 100)
    Rtn Points Won
    39% ( 37 of 96)
    102
    Total Points Won
    94
    L
    7-6(5) 5-7 6-1 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Jenson Brooksby
    Player
    Chak Lam Coleman Wong
    58% ( 35 of 60)
    1st Serve %
    56% ( 35 of 62)
    0
    Aces
    3
    3
    Double Faults
    3
    66% ( 23 of 35)
    1st Serve Won
    66% ( 23 of 35)
    72% ( 18 of 25)
    2nd Serve Won
    48% ( 13 of 27)
    38% ( 3 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 4)
    32% ( 19 of 60)
    Rtn Points Won
    42% ( 26 of 62)
    67
    Total Points Won
    55
    L
    6-2 6-4 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Viktor Durasovic
    Player
    Chak Lam Coleman Wong
    50% ( 43 of 86)
    1st Serve %
    63% ( 47 of 75)
    10
    Aces
    8
    1
    Double Faults
    2
    77% ( 33 of 43)
    1st Serve Won
    70% ( 33 of 47)
    56% ( 24 of 43)
    2nd Serve Won
    32% ( 9 of 28)
    36% ( 4 of 11)
    Break Points Won
    14% ( 1 of 7)
    34% ( 29 of 86)
    Rtn Points Won
    44% ( 33 of 75)
    90
    Total Points Won
    71
    L
    4-6 6-1 6-2 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Chak Lam Coleman Wong
    Player
    Rudolf Molleker
    53% ( 24 of 45)
    1st Serve %
    64% ( 38 of 59)
    4
    Aces
    4
    2
    Double Faults
    5
    83% ( 20 of 24)
    1st Serve Won
    63% ( 24 of 38)
    76% ( 16 of 21)
    2nd Serve Won
    43% ( 9 of 21)
    38% ( 3 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    20% ( 9 of 45)
    Rtn Points Won
    44% ( 26 of 59)
    62
    Total Points Won
    42
    W
    6-3 6-2 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Terence Atmane
    Player
    Chak Lam Coleman Wong
    59% ( 30 of 51)
    1st Serve %
    71% ( 42 of 59)
    10
    Aces
    4
    1
    Double Faults
    3
    80% ( 24 of 30)
    1st Serve Won
    67% ( 28 of 42)
    67% ( 14 of 21)
    2nd Serve Won
    24% ( 4 of 17)
    30% ( 3 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 1)
    25% ( 13 of 51)
    Rtn Points Won
    46% ( 27 of 59)
    65
    Total Points Won
    45
    L
    6-1 6-4 H2H

    Jorge Martinez Martinez Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    R1
    cross
    Jose Dominguez Alonso
    Player
    Jorge Martinez Martinez
    81% ( 52 of 64)
    1st Serve %
    78% ( 45 of 58)
    -
    Aces
    -
    2
    Double Faults
    3
    54% ( 28 of 52)
    1st Serve Won
    40% ( 18 of 45)
    67% ( 8 of 12)
    2nd Serve Won
    38% ( 5 of 13)
    60% ( 6 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    43% ( 3 of 7)
    44% ( 28 of 64)
    Rtn Points Won
    60% ( 35 of 58)
    71
    Total Points Won
    51
    L
    6-2 6-3 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Tom Gentzsch
    Player
    Jorge Martinez Martinez
    73% ( 60 of 82)
    1st Serve %
    61% ( 46 of 76)
    8
    Aces
    1
    4
    Double Faults
    2
    70% ( 42 of 60)
    1st Serve Won
    70% ( 32 of 46)
    50% ( 11 of 22)
    2nd Serve Won
    50% ( 15 of 30)
    40% ( 2 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    14% ( 1 of 7)
    35% ( 29 of 82)
    Rtn Points Won
    38% ( 29 of 76)
    82
    Total Points Won
    76
    L
    7-6(3) 6-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Jorge Martinez Martinez
    Player
    Gabriel Elicha Navas
    72% ( 74 of 103)
    1st Serve %
    78% ( 54 of 69)
    1
    Aces
    1
    3
    Double Faults
    0
    64% ( 47 of 74)
    1st Serve Won
    56% ( 30 of 54)
    41% ( 12 of 29)
    2nd Serve Won
    60% ( 9 of 15)
    71% ( 5 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 4 of 12)
    43% ( 44 of 103)
    Rtn Points Won
    43% ( 30 of 69)
    89
    Total Points Won
    83
    W
    6-2 2-6 6-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Gerald Melzer
    Player
    Jorge Martinez Martinez
    62% ( 57 of 92)
    1st Serve %
    69% ( 63 of 91)
    4
    Aces
    0
    4
    Double Faults
    5
    75% ( 43 of 57)
    1st Serve Won
    63% ( 40 of 63)
    49% ( 17 of 35)
    2nd Serve Won
    61% ( 17 of 28)
    60% ( 3 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    40% ( 2 of 5)
    35% ( 32 of 92)
    Rtn Points Won
    37% ( 34 of 91)
    94
    Total Points Won
    89
    L
    7-6(6) 2-6 6-1 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Clement Tabur
    Player
    Jorge Martinez Martinez
    71% ( 58 of 82)
    1st Serve %
    60% ( 59 of 98)
    2
    Aces
    1
    5
    Double Faults
    4
    66% ( 38 of 58)
    1st Serve Won
    46% ( 27 of 59)
    42% ( 10 of 24)
    2nd Serve Won
    54% ( 21 of 39)
    33% ( 6 of 18)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 4 of 8)
    41% ( 34 of 82)
    Rtn Points Won
    51% ( 50 of 98)
    98
    Total Points Won
    82
    L
    4-6 6-2 6-3 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Javier Barranco Cosano
    Player
    Jorge Martinez Martinez
    76% ( 39 of 51)
    1st Serve %
    53% ( 38 of 72)
    1
    Aces
    0
    0
    Double Faults
    2
    64% ( 25 of 39)
    1st Serve Won
    63% ( 24 of 38)
    67% ( 8 of 12)
    2nd Serve Won
    26% ( 9 of 34)
    56% ( 5 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 1 of 2)
    35% ( 18 of 51)
    Rtn Points Won
    54% ( 39 of 72)
    72
    Total Points Won
    51
    L
    6-1 6-4 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Jorge Martinez Martinez
    Player
    Miha Vetrih
    78% ( 39 of 50)
    1st Serve %
    60% ( 29 of 48)
    0
    Aces
    1
    1
    Double Faults
    5
    67% ( 26 of 39)
    1st Serve Won
    31% ( 9 of 29)
    64% ( 7 of 11)
    2nd Serve Won
    42% ( 8 of 19)
    46% ( 6 of 13)
    Break Points Won
    17% ( 1 of 6)
    34% ( 17 of 50)
    Rtn Points Won
    65% ( 31 of 48)
    64
    Total Points Won
    34
    W
    6-2 6-0 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Jorge Martinez Martinez
    Player
    Rafael Giotis
    79% ( 37 of 47)
    1st Serve %
    60% ( 38 of 63)
    1
    Aces
    0
    -
    Double Faults
    -
    73% ( 27 of 37)
    1st Serve Won
    55% ( 21 of 38)
    70% ( 7 of 10)
    2nd Serve Won
    36% ( 9 of 25)
    29% ( 4 of 14)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    28% ( 13 of 47)
    Rtn Points Won
    52% ( 33 of 63)
    67
    Total Points Won
    43
    W
    6-2 6-2 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Nicholas David Ionel
    Player
    Jorge Martinez Martinez
    72% ( 78 of 109)
    1st Serve %
    71% ( 55 of 78)
    2
    Aces
    0
    4
    Double Faults
    3
    67% ( 52 of 78)
    1st Serve Won
    58% ( 32 of 55)
    55% ( 17 of 31)
    2nd Serve Won
    48% ( 11 of 23)
    70% ( 7 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 3 of 12)
    37% ( 40 of 109)
    Rtn Points Won
    45% ( 35 of 78)
    104
    Total Points Won
    83
    L
    6-7(6) 6-0 6-4 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Jorge Martinez Martinez
    Player
    Jeremy Taylor
    56% ( 33 of 59)
    1st Serve %
    63% ( 39 of 62)
    2
    Aces
    0
    1
    Double Faults
    4
    70% ( 23 of 33)
    1st Serve Won
    44% ( 17 of 39)
    38% ( 10 of 26)
    2nd Serve Won
    43% ( 10 of 23)
    70% ( 7 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    57% ( 4 of 7)
    44% ( 26 of 59)
    Rtn Points Won
    56% ( 35 of 62)
    68
    Total Points Won
    53
    W
    6-3 7-5 H2H
    banner

    Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

    Wong & Martinez Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
    Chak Lam Coleman Wong Wong Stats Jorge Martinez Martinez Martinez
    56% (139/109) Win/Loss 59% (140/96)
    54% (311/267) Sets Win/Loss 58% (309/226)
    51% (2848/2721) Games Win/Loss 54% (2647/2229)
    0.48 Aces Per Game 0.07
    1313 Aces Total 169
    0.18 Double Faults Per Game 0.18
    502 Total Double Faults 419
    1:30:18 Average Match Time 1:5:16
    380.91 Average Opponent Rank 394.25
    60% (9161/15252) 1st Serve % 59% (5888/9963)
    71% (6480/9161) 1st Serve Win % 62% (3674/5888)
    48% (2947/6091) 2nd Serve Win % 50% (2026/4075)
    40% (583/1447) Break Points Won % (Total) 47% (575/1231)
    39% (5962/15383) Return Points Win % 44% (4463/10030)
    55% (134/243) Best of 3 Sets Win % 60% (138/229)
    100% (3/3) Best of 5 Sets Win % 33% (1/3)
    56% (45/81) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 37% (14/38)
    57% (46/81) Deciding Set Win % 55% (36/65)
    88% (129/113) 1st Set Won, Won Match 87% (146/127)
    12% (129/16) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 12% (146/18)
    21% (119/25) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 13% (90/12)

    Other Predictions

    Abidjan 1 Challenger

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Rome Challenger

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Gwangju Challenger

    flag
    flag
    Prediction
    • Loading news...